James Edward Gray II wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2006, at 9:06 AM, ara.t.howard / noaa.gov wrote:
>
>> it's why i __always__ use
>>
>>   "#{ obj }"       # no useless after all
>
> As far as I know, thats always equivalent to obj.to_s, which I think
> is better looking:

.... and more efficient - especially if the object is a string already. :-)

    robert