On Tuesday 10 January 2006 11:25 pm, David Vallner wrote:
> James Britt wrote:
> > Steve Litt wrote:
> >> Have you tried doing an ultra-simple ajax yet? Maybe the simplest
> >> possible ajax program could work, and then you could increment from
> >> there.
> >>
> >> I plan on doing a trivial Ajax program sometime this week, and I'll
> >> let you know what I find out.
> >
> > AJAX tends to be fairly simple; the hard part is tasteful application.
> >
> >
> > James
>
> I expect most of the application to be relatively simple callbacks to
> pan webcams, or push announcements from the server side. Why I'm aiming
> for a heavier AJAX setup is that besides a web client, the project also
> includes one or several rich clients, and I'm hoping to at least share
> basic design between those two instead of modelling the same interface
> twice for two UI paradigms, and in the ideal case using some declarative
> UI specifications and generating the interface from those.
>
> David Vallner

Hi David,

If you haven't already, you should sign up for the Rails list. Rails is a very 
broad subject, and a few days on that list gives you a broad overview. The 
Rails list is very enthusiastic and helpful.

Here's the signup details:

http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

I like being on the Ruby-Talk list for the Ruby language, and the Rails list 
for Rails.

HTH

SteveT

Steve Litt
http://www.troubleshooters.com
slitt / troubleshooters.com