On 1/8/06, dblack / wobblini.net <dblack / wobblini.net> wrote:

> Interestingly, <finish me later> is, in a sense, what yielding
> implies.

But is that yet another piece of the puzzle?  Is the fact that ruby
can pass around blocks of codes as just another object part of what
makes it suitable for metaprogramming?

When does plain old dynamicity cross the line to become 'metaprogramming'?
That's the million dollar question we've yet to answer :)