We already have a few established tags which people DO use and nobody
seems to be averse towards.  [ANN], [RAILS], and [QUIZ].  so it seems
like the only argument is over exactly how many there should be...not
whether we should have them at all. so i don't see why a suggestion to
add _2_ more should be mocked as the equivalent of saying we make a
specific tag for everything under the sun....we have 3 already. i
suggested we have a whopping 5! watch out--i'm crrrrrrazy!

i respect the logical arguments to stick with just the 3 and that's
fine but that's no reason to act like one or two more is completely
outlandish.

On 1/4/06, Lloyd Zusman <ljz / asfast.com> wrote:
> Justin Bishop <jubishop / gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I agree. using [SOLUTION] by itself makes sense.
> >
> > I like the idea of extending this concept further.  Is it already a
> > "recommendation" that new software announcements (or updates) have
> > [ANN] in their subject line?
> >
> > How about [QUESTION] for people looking for programming help, as well? ;o)
>
> ... and then we can have [ANSWER] for the responses, not to mention
> other things like [SUGGESTION], [RANT], [LANGUAGE-WAR], etc.  And since
> [OT] is already in use, for the sake of parity, we should also have
> [ON-TOPIC].  :)
>
>
> --
>  Lloyd Zusman
>  ljz / asfast.com
>  God bless you.
>
>
>