David Alan Black <dblack / candle.superlink.net> writes:


[...]

> For what it's worth, here's something I wrote a few months ago as a
> kind of testbed for this.  There was a bunch of discussion on this
> list around that time (about January).  I've added a test for your
> particular case.  This might at least provide a starting point for
> exploring.  I'm not sure what the status of Hash#default's future is
> (there were certainly suggestions for change/enhancement).

Thanks David! This lights up the problem much!



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://mandrakesoft.com/~gc/