In article <1136406073.177747.137450 / g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ako... <akonsu / gmail.com> wrote:
>hello,
>
>apparently ruby as most other languages has more than one way to
>express the same thing. i myself see no advantage of the code in active
>record that you posted and your code. except for the active record code
>is faster than yours because it does not check any variables at all
>when evaluating the table_name method.
>

I'm not so sure it's faster; it uses a class_eval.

Phil