On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 22:31 +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> "Tom Copeland" <tom / infoether.com> writes:
> 
> >> Here's missing one important point: While SVN ist generally 
> >> much friendlier then CVS, it's also more fragile. Especially 
> >> the BerkeleyDB-backend should be avoided at any cost as 
> >> berkdb is fragile on its own. 
> >
> > Yup, I've heard that too.  All RubyForge svn backends are using fsfs; I
> > even compiled Svn --without-berkeley-db just to avoid any possibility of
> > using that....
> 
> Bah, you can just admit you wanted to avoid all that library trouble! *g*

So true!  I did have a bit of a struggle with getting SWIG to the right
version to get ViewVC running with Subversion; descended into RPM
dependency hell there for a bit.  But, it all got sorted out
eventually...

Yours,

Tom