On Dec 31, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Peter Burns wrote:

> I think I've improved upon this test code a bit.  I found this one to
> be a bit brittle, as it will fail solutions with unanticipated paths
> of the same or smaller length.  I lost some of the metadata in the
> switch, as Steve has the different solutions ordered by type (i.e.
> primes, powers of two, etc).

Looks great Peter.  I posted a note about and link to your improved  
version on my [original post][1].

> I'm just pounding away at this test case code because my mathematician
> buddy is busy at the moment.  This is quite the nontrivial problem...

Exactly why I created my own test cases.  :)

--Steve

[1]: http://swaits.com/articles/2005/12/31/ruby-quiz-60-test-cases