------art_57732_25094401.1135800404384
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I haven't been around for a while so sorry to dive in all of a sudden again
(sadly very little opportunity to use Ruby these days and worse, my beloved
Ruby manuals were burnt to a cinder when our building came-a-cropper from
the Hemel Buncefield Oil-Depot "disaster").

Anyway, the Windows installer for Ruby is still 1.8.2-15 - is this still the
one most people use, or is there a "better way" to get and use Ruby now on a
Windows platform?

Merry Christmas/HNY all!

Glenn


On 12/28/05, George Moschovitis <george.moschovitis / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot! Merry Xmas to all ruby hackers!
>
> -g.
>
> On 12/28/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada / ge.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:59:12 +0900,
> > Curt Hibbs wrote in [ruby-talk:172735]:
> > > I think I'm going to stick with VC++ 7.1 for this round. I have a
> > > limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
> > > hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.
> >
> > I rather recommend VC6 or gcc -mnocygwin.
> >
> > --
> > Nobu Nakada
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.gmosx.com
> http://www.navel.gr
> http://www.nitrohq.com
>
>


--

All the best
Glenn
Aylesbury, UK

------art_57732_25094401.1135800404384--