On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

> Eric Hodel wrote:
>> On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:08 AM, ara.t.howard / noaa.gov wrote:
>>> i really, really prefer an options based approach to these kinds  
>>> of  things.
>>> when you have to pick a name for every method the development is   
>>> slowed.  pick
>>> a catch-all and configure it:
>>>
>>>   GC.gc(:mode => "every") do
>>>
>>>   end
>>>
>>>
>>> next week, when someone wants a new feature, it can be added it   
>>> without
>>> changing a thing:
>>>
>>>   GC.gc(:mode => "every", :pool => MyCustomPool) do
>>>
>>>   end
>> YAGNI
>
> YAGN what? GC.always or an options hash?

Somebody needs GC.always to help with debugging.  The options hash  
falls under YAGNI.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain / segment7.net - http://segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com