Peter Ertl wrote:
> that why I love ruby (and functional languages in general)
> 
> def fibonacci(n)
>   a, b = 1, 1
>   n.times do
>     a, b = b, a + b
>   end
>   a
> end
> 
> elegance beats ignorance (ruby vs. java)

What about that snippet demonstrates Ruby as a "functional language?" 
Do you mean functional in the Haskell sense, or are you trying to say 
something different?  Why have you chosen Java as the empitome of ignorance?

Am I just feeding a troll?