Christer Nilsson wrote on 12/13/2005 9:09 AM:

> can you tell as about any debugger speed differences between komodo and 
> arachno?

i much prefer the debugger in arachnoruby. i often need to debug
threads and it's a breeze using the arachnoruby debugger for that. and
of course it's faster. i found ruby thread debugging in komodo a bit
confusing, but it's entirely possible that i'm too used to using
arachnoruby for that

> what reasons do you see for using both?

for myself i also write perl and tcl/tk code and komodo is one stop
shopping there. i  had komodo registered before the full ruby support
was added.

if i was only writing in ruby i'd would use  arachnoruby exclusively.
and even though  it's still an early release it's completely usable
for me...

-- 
http://home.cogeco.ca/~tsummerfelt1
telnet://ventedspleen.dyndns.org