On Sunday 11 December 2005 09:07, Larry White wrote:
> Generally speaking, I prefer BSD (or  Apache) licenses for commercial
> work, though for most purposes LGPL is fine.  It really depends on
> your intentions since you did the heavy lifting.
>
> The fewer restrictions, the more commercial entities will like it -
> the less I have to explain to the company lawyers the better - but you
> need to decide whether you'd be happy in the (fairly unlikely) event
> that someone goes off and tries to commercialize a version and keep
> their changes proprietary.

Well, I am a commercial entity, and this will be created for my company, so 
you're guarenteed to have a permissive license. :-)  No worries.

> On 12/11/05, Kevin Brown <blargity / gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday 09 December 2005 16:04, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:16:55AM +0900, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > > > Use the GNU Graph utility.  It has no problem plotting regions and
> > > > all kinds of cool things.  You just give it a list of points in the
> > > > right order, and that's hunky dory. (so if you got negative and
> > > > positive, as is the case for your above equation, just give both (but
> > > > obviously in the right order) and you'll get your circle.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.gnu.org/software/plotutils/manual/html_mono/plotutils.html
> > > >#SEC 2
> > > >
> > > > And actually, I'm currently producing a ruby wrapper for this very
> > > > program that will be LGPL'ed or BSD'ed, so how long can you wait to
> > > > have this functionality?
> > >
> > > Are you trying to decide between the two licenses, or are you releasing
> > > it under both?
> >
> > I'm going to release it under a commercially friendly license.  Let me
> > know if you have a preference and I'd be happy to be accomodating.