Hi Kevin,

[for i in ..... end ]

> No, you can manipulate the counter just fine, just that it won't persist for 
> the next iteration of the count.  This is because ruby is providing the i for 
> you, but not actually checking it to know where it is, or when it's done, 
> unlike similarly worded constructs in C etc.

That (last part of the sentence) is exactly what confused me. Nobody
else thinks that this persistance would be useful?


Patrick