Hi,

> > > On a semi-ontopic post i'd like to remind that if your page uses
> > > captchas you should offer a alternative way of authenticating like
> > > phone or email because they are also excellent at keeping out blind
> > > people and people with other seeing disabilities.
> > 
> > well, I'm aware of this issue ... I just didn't need to solve it right
> > away because the site(s) I'll be deploying this on are mostly "visual",
> > so having seeing disabilities is deal breaker anyway.
> 
> I don't quite understand this.

it might be b/c English is not my first language?

> You appear to be saying: "It's OK for my package to discriminate
> against blind people, because I'm going to be doing that anyway."

Nah, what I really mean is something like:

I developed this for my Master's thesis and I expect it to be used
(by me) at servers that have mostly "visual" content, thus I didn't
have to work on this issue in the first version.

Since I released it to public, I'm more than willing to make necessary
changes to the code to support other authentication methods -- I'm
just not sure what it should be (or how to implement "aural" captcha
for example).

I'm open to any suggestions and/or patches.

Sounds better?

Rg,
           Michal
-- 
# Michal Safranek, email:
a=(("a".."z").to_a+["@","."]);p(("%b"%[0x645bbb83a6a496]
).scan(/...../).map{|x|a[Integer("0b"+x)]}.join.reverse)