MenTaLguY wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 08:17 +0900, Trans wrote:
> > > Sure, they look cool, but they'd be a living nightmare in reality...
> >
> > Would they? Wouldn't 'share' just point the closure's var to the local
> > one? And 'local' would do just the opposite, (albeit it have to create
> > the local var in that case). That seems simple enough. Or am I missing
> > something?
>
> Well, keep going.  How would this work with e.g. nested closures?
>
> Also, in terms of implementation, how would you set up the variable
> pads?

I am not knowledgable enough about the matter to continue. So the
feasibility beyond that is the call of some one with more experience
here, like yourself. If you think it's impossible (or virtually so)
then I have to take your word on it.

T.