--4CECFfxceZRTRrurQVi
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 08:17 +0900, Trans wrote:
> > Sure, they look cool, but they'd be a living nightmare in reality...
> 
> Would they? Wouldn't 'share' just point the closure's var to the local
> one? And 'local' would do just the opposite, (albeit it have to create
> the local var in that case). That seems simple enough. Or am I missing
> something?

Well, keep going.  How would this work with e.g. nested closures?

Also, in terms of implementation, how would you set up the variable
pads?

-mental

--4CECFfxceZRTRrurQVi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDbAGZcUNIGiXCc4MRAs8ZAKDCV2hCeh5G4u6AKejMQJxvhLN7eQCglaMo
G+75fiPj3XTZbx/0wmjp4c0yT1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4CECFfxceZRTRrurQVi--