On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 05:52 +0900, Trans wrote:
> MenTaLguY wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 05:07 +0900, Trans wrote:
> > > > Any suggestions for what the interface for enabling/disabling caching
> > > > should look like?  I think I may as well roll this stuff into a library
> 
> ???

It sounded like you were suggesting that caching should require the user
to explicitly use memoize; I was just pointing out that caching would be
(by far) the most common use case.

I was looking for a suggestion on how memoization should be disabled in
the rare cases when it's not desired.

-mental