Trans wrote:
> Zach Dennis wrote:
> 
>>>I just
>>>don't particularly care for the proposed syntax:
>>>
>>>  anon = ->(x = 5) { ... }
>>>
>>
>>Was there an RCR for this syntax? If so what is it's name, I do not see
>>it on rcrchive.net ?
> 
> 
> It's Matz' baby; borrwoed from Perl. So no RCR required.
> 

Is the -> syntax still open for debate Matz? I agree with Austin on 
this. The syntax here is just ugly.

Zach