William James ha scritto:

>>Thanks for sharing this. You claim 'faster' CSV parsing. Faster than
>>what,
> 
> 
> Than Ruby's standard-lib csv.rb.
> 
> 
>>and by how much? Got any benchmark results to share?
> 
> 
> For my test file of 1,964,211 bytes, it's about 6.4 times as fast.

what things is this missing wrt standard csv.rb?

Also, why you did choose to make all of the stuff (methods, variables) 
at class level instead of instance ?