Brian Schr?der wrote:
> If you are so bold, I have to chime in again to say that
>
>   ary.sort_by :meth
>
> reads a lot better than
>
>   ary.sort_by.meth
>
> because we don't do method chaining here.
>
> Sorry, could not resist. ;-)

Ahhhhh... but can you do:

   ary.sort_by.meth(foo, bar, wack!)

T.