Hal Fulton wrote:
...

> 
> Logan's KirbyRecord was a step in the right direction,
> it seemed to me. But it was like ActiveRecord -- it
> forced you to store your metadata in your own objects.
> 
> Og is cool, but is even more intrusive.

What do you mean by 'metadata'? The data types of your object's state?



James
-- 

http://www.ruby-doc.org - The Ruby Documentation Site
http://www.rubyxml.com  - News, Articles, and Listings for Ruby & XML
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com  - Playing with Better Toys