Hal Fulton wrote:
> I offer this in the spirit of the old "purity test" and the
> "nerdity test" that was derived therefrom.
> 
> Don't take it *too* seriously. All point weights are strictly
> my opinion and are subject to change.

Hmm, I thought it was going to be like Erd?s numbers.

If you are matz, you have a Ruby number of 0.

If you've contributed patches to code written by matz, you have a Ruby 
number of 1.

If you've worked on code with someone who has a Ruby number of 1, you 
have a Ruby number of 2, and so on.


<URL:http://www.oakland.edu/enp/>


mathew
-- 
<URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/>
          WE HAVE TACOS