On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Robert Klemme wrote:

> Why not directly use the block?  I think it's a tad more efficient:
<snip>
> def of(&b) (0...self).map(&b) end
>
> But what do you need that for?  I couldn't find it...
>

yeah - remnants of partial solution on both counts.  should've cleaned it up a
bit more first ;-)

the 'of' method is one of my favouraites - i think i have an RCR out there for
it...

regards.

-a
-- 
===============================================================================
| email :: ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
| phone :: 303.497.6469
| anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned.
| -- h.h. the 14th dalai lama
===============================================================================