Brian Schr?der wrote:
> On 19/10/05, Robert Klemme <bob.news / gmx.net> wrote:
>> Brian Schr?der wrote:
>>>  [snip]
>>
>> How about
>> #deq
>> #deq_key
>> #deq_prio
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>     robert
>>
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> I assume you use deq as a short for dequeue. In this case I have the
> problem that the name
> dequeue_key would somehow imply that the key was removed while
> deq_prio would imply removing the priority. This does not make sense
> if one knows the datastructure, but I'm not too happy with it.

OTOH: if you know the data structure, you know that the prio is not
removed. :-) Does this method return the prio of the last removed element
or the current min prio?

Kind regards

    robert