Because the big array was done once, and the little array was done many times?

j.

On 10/18/05, Zach Dennis <zdennis / mktec.com> wrote:
> Could someone explain to my dense brain....how some of these solutions
> can be slower on little arrays, but they have "0.0000" time on a big
> array? Even if it was "0.0001"....I would buy it, but '0.0000' is
> wigging me out. =)
>
>
> Zach
>
>


--
"http://ruby-lang.org -- do you ruby?"

Jeff Wood