On Monday 17 October 2005 05:01 pm, daz wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 October 2005 07:12 am, daz wrote:
> > >       + + +    S T O P   H E R E    + + +
> > If not, what should stop there?
>
> Original Poster should stop reading because an implementation follows.
>
> My feeling is that, when writing a program like this, more
> is learned from "trial and error" than from copying someone
> else's algorithm.

Now I understand!  Thanks!

Randy Kramer