From: Dave Thomas <Dave / thomases.com>

> "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker / jump.net> writes:
>
> > Is there any reason that all mutator methods should not be denoted by
having
> > a '!'?
>
>   arr[1]=! 1
>
> is a little ugly!

Good point.

But what I actually had in mind was names of mutator methods with predefined
English names or (more or less) alphanumeric user-defined names.

Conrad