>===== Original Message From Chris Moline <ugly-daemon / home.com> =====
>On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:08:51AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>> I don't think Ruby License would be a problem, although it might not
>> be GPL compatible as bad as Perl Artistic License.
>I thought ruby was released under the GPL?? Or am I misunderstanding 
something??

Ruby is mostly dual licensed.

I say mostly because there are a couple of borrowed components
that are under different license terms.

Cheers,
Ben