matz / zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

>I like this idea.

Thanks.

>  My only concern left is whether "include?" is a
>proper method for "in" operator or not.

Well, it's just another rule like that "for" uses "each".  Of course,
one could add a method "in" to Object and use

 def in(collection) collection.includes? self end

This would be more similar to the way operators like "+" or "[]" are
treaten, but I'm not sure whether this is really needed.


bye
-- 
Stefan Matthias Aust \/ Truth Until Paradox