Hi --

On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Eric Mahurin wrote:

> To take advantage of type (really class) inference in an
> optimal way, you'd need to know that the methods aren't
> changing.

What about type (really type) inference? :-)  There have been some
interesting projects looking at the matter of checking types in Ruby
(not based on class/module membership), including one by Eivind and I
think one by Florian Gross.  It's not easy... but anything less is, I
think inevitably and almost by definition, going to reduce what one
can do in Ruby.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net