------art_770_29914805.1128059093035
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

There are step-by-step instructions on how to setup Arachno Ruby for Rails.
See the Rails wiki and search on Arachno.
 Mike Pence

 On 9/30/05, Dirk Meijer <hawkman.gelooft / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i've been using SciTE for a while now, and i like it, just one things
> bothers me:
> /#{variable}/ is seen as a comment instead of a regular expression..
> and just for that, i'd switch editors. oh yeah, and it's printing doesn't
> really look very good.
> greetings, Dirk.
>
> 2005/9/30, Corey Lawson <corey.ssf.lawson / gmail.com>:
> >
> > ArachnoRuby works fine as a Ruby "IDE". There isn't really an IDE for
> > Rails
> > per se, but how hard can it be to edit code in ArachnoRuby (or SciTE, or
> > UltraEdit or even Notepad), keep 2 DOS windows open (one to do "scaffold
> > generate ...", and the other to start and stop webbrick), and a web
> > browser
> > window to hit the web pages? At least for development, there is
> generally
> > not much need to restart webbrick.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/29/05, bonefry <bellarchitects / gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > there are 2 important things missing from Ruby right now: a fast VM
> and
> > > a good IDE. Until you have those you really cannot do "Enterprise
> > > Scale" applications.
> > > But maybe in the future.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

------art_770_29914805.1128059093035--