Dan Kohn wrote:
> Daz, there's a bug in the CVS version of REXML.
> The following code produces the error below, but works
> perfectly with the default 1.8.2 REXML [...]

Thanks Dan.

The REXML code in that area looks quite "fluid" and
there are clear warnings to "turn away" (which I heeded ;).

I've filed a bug report which you might want to check over
and then keep a watch on.

http://www.germane-software.com/projects/rexml/ticket/32


Cheers,

daz