Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
>
> What if you were to store an array of keys in the
> 'relationshipkey' field that specifies the relationships(separate
> from the primary key). Then your one to many relationship could
> actually be a one to one from an element in the array to the child in
> the other table.
>

[snippage]

I did think of something like this, but it just seemed too hairy,
too daunting. I didn't even mention it to Jamey. KB has no way to
store an array field as such in the first place, nor do I know how
you'd really implement it.


Hal