On 01/09/05, James Edward Gray II <james / grayproductions.net> wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Florian Growrote:
> 
> > Dave Burt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> You'd have to have a better alternative, and I can't think of one.
> >> Consistent naming's important, and I'd rather not be using
> >> interesting suffixes like "nano/array/rotate_bang".
> >>
> >
> > Why not? I think I would prefer this over uri escaping. It's also
> > the convention Ruby uses for the C method names.
> 
> Yeah, I have to agree here.  I can translate ! to _bang a lot easier
> than I can think up what the URI escape code is.
> 
> James Edward Gray II
> 
> 
> 

It thought nano tweaks include to do the conversion behind the scenes.
Such that you can do

require 'file/exists?'

and require first escapes the ? and then calls the old require.

But I have not used this libs so far.

regards,

Brian

-- 
http://ruby.brian-schroeder.de/

Stringed instrument chords: http://chordlist.brian-schroeder.de/