On Sep 1, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Florian Growrote:

> Dave Burt wrote:
>
>
>> You'd have to have a better alternative, and I can't think of one.  
>> Consistent naming's important, and I'd rather not be using  
>> interesting suffixes like "nano/array/rotate_bang".
>>
>
> Why not? I think I would prefer this over uri escaping. It's also  
> the convention Ruby uses for the C method names.

Yeah, I have to agree here.  I can translate ! to _bang a lot easier  
than I can think up what the URI escape code is.

James Edward Gray II