James Edward Gray II wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Trans wrote:
>
> >
> > Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> >
> >> foo.instance_eval{
> >>   send(:bar)
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > Matz, this whole thing of "protecting the programmer" via name games
> > and block scopes, is a weak solution.
>
> This isn't the reason a change to send() is being considered.
> Perhaps you should go back and read some of the previous methods in
> this thread.

I'm not talking about the reason for the change to send(), but the
proposed solution --it is part of the tactic.

T.