Stefan Lang wrote:
> Why not simply write it as:
>
>     a.meth
>
> ?

I was just demoing the syntax --I should have shown an iterpolating
example.

> IMHO, most times you use send because you don't know the exact
> method to call when you're writing the script.
> Usually it's something like:
>
>     a.send message, 1, 2, 3
>
> (where 'message' is a variable) which I find better than:
>
>     a."#{message}" 1, 2, 3

As to utitliy there is no differnce. As to aesthetics, I grant you
--though many a time you have to build up the message anyway, say:

  a."#{msg}=" x

Besides, look at all the fun you miss ;-)

  a.("%s" % message) 1,2,3

T.

P.S. Well, I can tell this will go no where. Oh, well. So much for E4X
and my running johnny :)