On 27 Aug 2005, at 13:46, Austin Ziegler wrote:

> On 8/27/05, ES <ruby-ml / magical-cat.org> wrote:
>
>> I am thinking of starting something up to entirely
>> replace (not fix) RDoc, so I need some input.
>>
>
> Honestly, I don't want to see RDoc replaced. I *do* want to see it
> fixed. If this means that you create an implementation that replaces
> the current one while keeping the same interface and it's of a
> high-enough quality that Matz accepts it into the core, then more
> power to you. However, if it isn't going to make it into the core,
> then I think that it's a bit of a distraction and you'd be better off
> working with the RDoc maintainers (and possibly seeing about becoming
> one yourself) to fix what's wrong with RDoc.

If RDoc is broken, people should file bugs so that us maintainers can  
fix things.

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=2472&group_id=627&func=browse

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain / segment7.net - http://segment7.net
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04