On 8/27/05, ES <ruby-ml / magical-cat.org> wrote: > I am thinking of starting something up to entirely > replace (not fix) RDoc, so I need some input. Honestly, I don't want to see RDoc replaced. I *do* want to see it fixed. If this means that you create an implementation that replaces the current one while keeping the same interface and it's of a high-enough quality that Matz accepts it into the core, then more power to you. However, if it isn't going to make it into the core, then I think that it's a bit of a distraction and you'd be better off working with the RDoc maintainers (and possibly seeing about becoming one yourself) to fix what's wrong with RDoc. -austin -- Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com * Alternate: austin / halostatue.ca