ES wrote:
> I am thinking of starting something up to entirely
> replace (not fix) RDoc, so I need some input.

Have you considered discussion this in the ruby-doc mailing list?  There 
have been assorted discussion there on rj, ri.next, and so on.

You can find info about the list at

http://www.ruby-doc.org


As for feature requests, the ability to rdoc/ri new files while not 
risking the munging of existing rdoc/ri data sets.

(Incidentally, are you planning on replacing ri in the process?  It 
seems that an ri alternative would be a natural thing add, even if you 
are not targeting that.)


James

-- 

http://www.ruby-doc.org - The Ruby Documentation Site
http://www.rubyxml.com  - News, Articles, and Listings for Ruby & XML
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com  - Playing with Better Toys