On 24 Aug 2005, at 04:06, Lothar Scholz wrote:

> Hello Eric,
>
> EH> On 23 Aug 2005, at 15:27, Lothar Scholz wrote:
>
>
>>> Hello Eric,
>>>
>>> EH> Currently, rubygems does not generate ri information.  It is
>>> EH> commented out.
>>>
>>> Which is good, because ri has a broken design that does not
>>> fullfill with
>>> the purpose of a package manager. It would otherwise slowly fill  
>>> your
>>> system with garbage. I worked around that in ArachnoRuby, but it
>>> should be fixed in "rdoc.rb".
>>>
>
> EH> I don't see any bugs matching that description in the rdoc bug or
> EH> feature requests tracker.
>
> EH> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=2472&group_id=627&func=browse
> EH> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=2475&group_id=627&func=browse
>
> Okay i added this, but what sense does it make as long as nobody is
> maintaining "rdoc" ?

Ryan Davis (and myself) have taken over maintainership.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain / segment7.net - http://segment7.net
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04