On 24 Aug 2005, at 04:06, Lothar Scholz wrote: > Hello Eric, > > EH> On 23 Aug 2005, at 15:27, Lothar Scholz wrote: > > >>> Hello Eric, >>> >>> EH> Currently, rubygems does not generate ri information. It is >>> EH> commented out. >>> >>> Which is good, because ri has a broken design that does not >>> fullfill with >>> the purpose of a package manager. It would otherwise slowly fill >>> your >>> system with garbage. I worked around that in ArachnoRuby, but it >>> should be fixed in "rdoc.rb". >>> > > EH> I don't see any bugs matching that description in the rdoc bug or > EH> feature requests tracker. > > EH> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=2472&group_id=627&func=browse > EH> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=2475&group_id=627&func=browse > > Okay i added this, but what sense does it make as long as nobody is > maintaining "rdoc" ? Ryan Davis (and myself) have taken over maintainership. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain / segment7.net - http://segment7.net FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04