--XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

* Gavin Kistner wrote (2005-08-21 16:41):
>On Aug 21, 2005, at 1:49 AM, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>>I also wonder why you use a look-ahead, I would rather use a
>>look-behind.
>
>A negative look-behind would be the perfect, simple approach to this =20
>regex problem. Unfortunately, Ruby's current regexp handler does not =20
>have such a feature.

Sorry if I added to the confusion, I'm pretty new to Ruby and wasn't
aware of that limitation.


Thorsten
--=20
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing about email these days?

--XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCLqzW/x2JEBlodoRAn9ZAKCWOaH4VU77pvZ2Kb6UCfl/XK/IVwCgl39K
2JiFXbTTIb/1Vjs8FWXGiJ8=
=6H/k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XWOWbaMNXpFDWE00--

Hi,

* Gavin Kistner wrote (2005-08-21 16:41):
>On Aug 21, 2005, at 1:49 AM, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>>I also wonder why you use a look-ahead, I would rather use a
>>look-behind.
>
>A negative look-behind would be the perfect, simple approach to this =20
>regex problem. Unfortunately, Ruby's current regexp handler does not =20
>have such a feature.

Sorry if I added to the confusion, I'm pretty new to Ruby and wasn't
aware of that limitation.


Thorsten
--=20
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing about email these days?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCLqzW/x2JEBlodoRAn9ZAKCWOaH4VU77pvZ2Kb6UCfl/XK/IVwCgl39K
2JiFXbTTIb/1Vjs8FWXGiJ8=
=6H/k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----