On 8/21/05, Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck / gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know if this has been discussed before (didn't find any messages
> when I searched on Google Groups).
> 
> I think we should purchase www.ruby.net - it's much cleaner and
> easy-to-pass-on-to-others than www.ruby-lang.org, it's shorter, and it's
> up for sale (www.ruby.org isn't being used for a website, but I don't
> think it's for sale). I'd be happy to chip in with some cash if we
> decide to buy it.

Not a bad idea.Normal psychology to use direct names for the
language.I would prefer ruby.org and then ruby.net.

Thanks n Regards
Dibya Prakash
> 
> Maybe we could even make a new Ruby site (with a php.net style
> documentation!). Well, we can always discuss that later.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel Schierbeck
> 
>