On Aug 19, 2005, at 4:03 AM, Lyndon Samson wrote:
> Maybe replace _erbout with an IO object ( including StringIO? )
>
> then you could have explicit _erbout.puts calls

It already works to have explcit _erbout.concat or _erbout.<< calls;  
the desire here is not one of functionality, but instead of having  
the raw print and puts methods work as many people expect them to  
inside an ERB template.