mathew ha scritto:
> gabriele renzi wrote:
> 
>> Jacob Fugal ha scritto:
>>
>>> I'm a little confused then... how do you disambiguate implicit block
>>> terminators without significant whitespace? 
>>
>>
>> The rule is not hard, it's just "when there is no ambiguity, you can 
>> omit", it's just like the use of parenthesis (or is it parenses?) 
>> around arguments.
> 
> 
> Can you post some examples of situations where there is no ambiguity, 
> without treating whitespace as significant?

well, the same I wrote in the first message (i.e. a method after a 
method, a constant after a method etc)