Hi --

On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Daniel Brockman wrote:

> "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> writes:
>
>> I'm still not seeing how
>>
>>    [:]
>>
>> or
>>
>>    [=>]
>>
>> conveys the notion of 'emptiness' better than
>>
>>    {}
>
> The reason people are suggesting the [:] syntax is to avoid
> the confusion with blocks.  Since {} doesn't avoid the
> confusion with blocks, [:] is in this sense better.

I may be taking the discussion in a circle, but... what confusion with
blocks?  (I'm confused about the confusion :-)


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net