http://redhanded.hobix.com/inspect/seeingMetaclassesClearly.html

On 8/4/05, Alexandru Popescu <the_mindstorm / evolva.ro> wrote:
> #: Reyn Vlietstra changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  8/4/2005 12:07 PM :#
> > Attributes, metadata on methods are one of the things C# gave me that
> > I truely miss.
> > Maybe because I dont know ruby that well yet ...
> >
> > On 8/4/05, Jeff Wood <jeff.darklight / gmail.com> wrote:
> >> There is also a really good section in PickAxe2 on metaprogramming.
> >>
> >> j.
> >>
> >> On 8/4/05, Alexandru Popescu <the_mindstorm / evolva.ro> wrote:
> >> > #: Jeff Wood changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  8/4/2005 9:06 AM :#
> >> > > Yeah, Why's got a great article in his blog on metaprogramming.
> >> > >
> >> > > j.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > I think I have tried that article a couple of times, but my Ruby understanding was pretty young at
> >> > that moment. Maybe I will try it again.
> >> >
> >> > :alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|
> >> >
> >> > > On 8/3/05, Pit Capitain <pit / capitain.de> wrote:
> >> > >> Alexandru Popescu schrieb:
> >> > >> > Is there any metadata that can be associated with a method? I know it is
> >> > >> > an object, and maybe you can attach some metadata to it. From that point
> >> > >> > on the things will be more simple.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> No, you can't attach metadata to methods, but you can attach them to the
> >> > >> class or module where the methods are defined. I think this should be
> >> > >> enough for something like TestNG. For more info look into the archives
> >> > >> of ruby-talk or ruby-core (I don't remember where).
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Regards,
> >> > >> Pit
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "So long, and thanks for all the fish"
> >>
> >> Jeff Wood
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> Does anyone still has the reference to the why blog entry about metadaata? thanks a lot
> 
> :alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|
> 
> 


-- 
"So long, and thanks for all the fish"

Jeff Wood