I just noticed that all of the following give syntax errors:

 * assert not foo

 * assert not(foo)

 * assert(not foo)

 * assert(not(foo))

I would like them all to be equivalent to the following:

   assert !foo

At the _very_ least, the fully-bracketed one should work,
but it would be great if they all worked.

-- 
Daniel Brockman <daniel / brockman.se>

    So really, we all have to ask ourselves:
    Am I waiting for RMS to do this?   --TTN.