On Jul 6, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Lothar Scholz wrote:

> Yes, but i think the idea is to not provide an alternative. IMHO the
> way we should go is to enforce the use of rubygems as a primary
> solution and so to force development on rubygems, its not that much
> work that must be done, but it must be done sooner or later.
>
> I think this is the way you get the best technology - unfortunately
> it is not popular for many open source developers.
>
> Rubygems could be a killer feature for ruby, so we should use it.

Well said.  I agree 100%.

James Edward Gray II